/

January 3, 2026

When Simplicity Becomes a Lie

Shares

After years of consultancy, I’ve come to understand that organisations are systems designed for efficiency; humans are not.

Most workplace friction comes from this fundamental mismatch.

Why experience at work often feels harder than it “should”

Organizations optimize for:

  • predictability

  • control

  • risk reduction

  • scalability

Humans operate through:

  • context

  • meaning

  • relationships

  • tacit knowledge

When these two logics collide, people experience:

  • frustration (“this makes no sense”)

  • disengagement (“why bother?”)

  • exhaustion (“everything is harder than it needs to be”)

This is not a personal failure. It is a structural tension.

The illusion of simplicity in organizations

Just like with technology, organizations often believe:

“If we ask simpler questions, things will be simpler.”

In reality:

  • Problems are simplified before they are understood

  • Complexity is pushed downward onto individuals

  • People are blamed for systemic issues

This creates a common pattern:

  • Leadership asks for clarity

  • Middle layers translate complexity into procedures

  • Frontline workers absorb the unresolved contradictions

The result is emotional labor disguised as “professionalism”.

Why people feel unheard even when they are consulted

Many organizations ask questions but do not change their listening level.

They ask:

  • tactical questions when the issue is strategic

  • performance questions when the issue is cultural

  • compliance questions when the issue is relational

People then feel:

  • “I answered, but nothing changed”

  • “They don’t really want to know”

  • “The real issue is unspeakable here”

Over time, silence becomes a survival strategy.

Experience is shaped more by interfaces than by intentions

In organizations, interfaces matter more than values.

Interfaces include:

  • processes

  • meetings

  • tools

  • KPIs

  • reporting structures

  • approval chains

Even well-intentioned organizations create poor experiences if their interfaces:

  • break context

  • fragment responsibility

  • reward the wrong behaviors

  • punish honesty indirectly

People don’t experience strategy.
They experience how hard it is to do their job.

The quiet cost: cognitive and moral fatigue

When people repeatedly have to:

  • work around broken systems

  • translate reality into acceptable language

  • pretend problems are individual rather than systemic

They accumulate:

  • cognitive fatigue (“thinking for the system”)

  • moral fatigue (“knowing what’s right but being unable to act”)

This is one of the main drivers of burnout, even in “good” organizations.

What actually improves human experience at work

Across organizations, improvements consistently come from a few conditions:

  • Problems are allowed to be fully articulated before being simplified

  • Authority matches responsibility

  • Feedback changes decisions, not just dashboards

  • People are trusted with context, not just tasks

  • Failure is treated as information, not guilt

These are cultural choices, not technological ones.

The deeper truth

Most people don’t leave organizations because of workload or technology.

They leave because:

  • reality cannot be spoken

  • effort is disconnected from impact

  • intelligence is constrained rather than used

In that sense, the human experience at work is less about motivation and more about permission:
permission to see clearly, to name things honestly, and to act coherently.

From the same category